Obama intends to make U. S. Citizens as miserable as possible during the sequestering. But will he go so far as to affect the food supply? He understands how effective the power of the purse is when it comes to forcing people to do what you want them to do. So does all levels of government. That is why punishments of all kinds almost always include some form of financial punishment to be paid to the punishing entity. As a matter of fact, the framers of the constitution knew the power of money. They wrote the constitution carefully to be sure not one entity had enough power to control the money.
Money is the tool of the government to control the citizens. It started rather benignly with the first government assistance programs during the depression. Why? Because someone looked at the government and said, “Why haven’t you done anything about this?”. That’s the same thing people in Europe said to the church about the plague. Both entities tried, without success, to change the prevailing condition. The church eventually reversed some of the edicts about what to do with sick people, but the government kept pretty much all of the “new programs” created during the depression.
Once a program was created, the next members of congress and presidents were loath to remove them because they didn’t want to anger the people who were depending on those programs, even if the current situation no longer warranted the program’s existence. Then came the day when the government invented the department of education in order to control schools in every state. It started out with grants to states’ school districts. After a while the government started attaching strings to the grants. Once the states were dependent on the money for the annual budget, the hook was set and now the government can tell states what will be done in their public schools. And so it went also with the highway department and human assistance programs, just to start.
Which brings us to the food supply. Meat processing plants all have USDA inspectors present to assure the products are safe for human consumption. Well, sort of, but that is another story. If the inspectors are not present, no meat can be processed. This isn’t a big deal to the prepper who is ready for just such an event. However, if you are not ready and the USDA does decide to pull inspectors for a week or two, things will be different in the store. It is our belief that the inspectors won’t be pulled and that the USDA will cut in other areas as necessary.
Disrupting the food supply, if only for a couple of weeks, would be a big deal and a no win situation for Obama and his cabinet. Congress does not determine where the budget cuts are made during a sequester. The president does. Rest assured, the president will attempt to say that the cuts are the fault of the Republicans. Don’t believe it. The fault will be with whomever decides what to cut within each agency and at whose instruction.
Consider these comments about the sequester and decisions being made:
It’s the public’s trust that’s been broken “and since almost all food safety at retail is faith-based, the faith has been violated.” – USA Today
. . . in regards to the government’s plans for sequestration and the meat industry. If you aren’t aware of what’s going on, you should be. After all, it could affect all of us. And to us in the industry, it’s a scary thing. – Jennifer Dewey
It is clear that department leaders are concerned about their particular branch of the government. So are the people who raise, process and sell meat products. As a society we can go without meat for a couple of weeks. But, should the citizens be forced to do it because the people on capitol hill can’t play nice?
The Power of the Purse: A History of American Public Finance, 1776-1790 by Ferguson, E. James published by The University of North Carolina Press Paperback, 1961 – 2011.